Reflexions Professional Hair Ponto Grille and Carvery Top Up Service Station Wolwedans Game Farm Delfinos.Passion for food-Passion for life Property Pointer Beach House Restaurant Oyster World Skorpios Security

 

MosselbayonTheline | First With The News

Déjà Vu - a feeling of having already experienced the present situation.

More than a year expired since Mossel Bay municipal manager Thys Giliomee was given the green light to enter negotiations with George municipality regarding the appointment of a consultant to investigate the pros and cons of forming a metropolitan municipality. 

All residents' concerns, enquiries and questions regarding the progress of these talks - and especially the impact and consequences of such a merger on taxpaying residents and property owners  -  were ever since flatly ignored. Mosselbayontheline was even removed from the municipality's media list for daring to publish pertinent questions and readers' letters that went unanswered in this regard. 

Now, when the country's municipal sector is at an all-time low and facing total collapse with only 49 of the 250 municipalities having managed to score a clean audit, the same process is starting all over again - only this time the ball is apparently in George municipality's court to initiate the metro negotiations.

Thys Giliomee1

Mossel Bay municipal manager Thys Giliomee

But the public's questions and fears have since escalated dramatically seeing that neither Mossel Bay nor George achieved a clean audit last year, and Mossel Bay taxpayers are already up in arms over the hefty tariff and tax increases in the proposed 2019/2020 budget.

Although Mossel Bay was rated the top performing municipality in the country in the Good Governance Africa (GGA)-index, it lost its top rating for financial stability in the latest Ratings Afrika-index.

 

oudit

End of an era? In February last year after scoring the sixth consecutive clean audit in 2017, are from left deputy mayor Dirk Kotzé, councillor Mark Furness, mayor Harry Levendal, finance chief Kobus Bruwer and municipal manager Thys Giliomee.

Furthermore, a very bleak overall picture for the country's municipalities is portrayed in Ratings Afrika’s latest Municipal Financial Sustainability Index (MFSI) for 2018 in which municipalities are rated out of 100 based on operating performance, liabilities management, budget practises and liquidity. 

The national average slipped below 40 to 38 for the first time since the index was calculated in 2012. Of the top 100 municipalities, 56 scored less than 35. * More at the bottom.

 * Mossel Bay residents fear they will have to foot the bill for the bankrupt George municipality's debt - especially after the Hawks' raid at George municipality on 23 April last year and subsequent threats to place George municipality under administration. 

http://www.mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/samesmelting-met-george-om-n-metropool-te-vorm-hoekom-die-stilswye?

 http://www.mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/geheimhouding-oor-metropool-duur-voort?f

 

BABY STEPS TO FORMING A METRO

George Herald - Wednesday, 17 April 2019

George and Mossel Bay municipalities are investigating the possibility of becoming a metropolitan municipality. The rapid expansion of both towns is given as one of the main reasons why forming a metro might be a good idea.

A resolution taken in the George council on 3 April gave the municipal manager, Trevor Botha, the go-ahead to enter discussions with Mossel Bay Municipality.

He may also enter an agreement concerning the supply chain management process needed for the appointment of a consultant. "These discussions will then lead to clearly defined roles and responsibilities and clarity regarding the costs of appointing such a consultant," said Botha.

Trevor Botha

George Municipal Manager Trevor Botha Photo: Michelle Pienaar

Mossel Bay requested that the two municipalities split the cost. Should George and Mossel Bay become a metro, residents will pay less for service delivery.

Botha says the establishment of a metro will undoubtedly derive economic benefits to government as it "exploits economies of scale" which will result in a reduction of costs of service delivery due to, amongst others, centralisation and integration of systems.

Financial and administrative resources will be shared and distributed within the metropolitan area to ensure equity and social justice. Strategic land-use planning will be promoted. A city-wide framework for economic and social development will be developed, thereby enhancing the competitiveness and well-being of the city."

Mossel Bay Municipality tabled an item before their council on 22 February last year to appoint a suitably qualified and experienced consultant to undertake such an investigation.

(https://www.georgeherald.com/News/Article/General/baby-steps-to-forming-a-metro-201904170952?f

Municipal sector faces collapse – Ratings Afrika

Less than a quarter of the 100 top municipalities reported a profit in 2018.

Unless corrective action is taken, a crisis is inevitable. And when service delivery is poor, violence is never far behind. Political leaders need to look at the interests of residents and businesses rather than their own, says the agency. They need to root out corruption, appoint managers with the right skills and experience, and apply sound budgetary practices and strict financial discipline.

Very little of this is in evidence in the latest MFSI. “The current political leadership in control of the majority of municipalities has demonstrated over the last five years and more to not being capable of sound governance,” says Ratings Afrika. “This is the main cause of the deteriorating financial sustainability of the municipal sector in SA.”

Of the seven metros analysed by Ratings Afrika, Cape Town came out tops for financial sustainability. Joburg came last.

Both are DA-run, so gloating rights ahead of the national elections are severely curtailed.

Tshwane, too, looks like it needs a financial reboot with a working capital deficit of R3.2 billion. It’s also DA-run, but is starting to show signs of improvement, reporting a R336 million operating surplus in 2018.

Joburg reported a deficit of R250 million in 2018 and has suffered a deterioration in its MFSI score from 43 to 29 over the last five years.

Ratings Afrika analyst Leon Claassen says it is difficult to draw political inferences from these scores, since many municipalities and metros are grappling with long-standing legacy and debt issues. However, it is well known that the governing party in each jurisdiction stacks management with political appointees.

Drop in electricity sales for Joburg

An analysis of Joburg’s revenue shows electricity sales dropping nearly R900 million to R13.5 billion – a decline of roughly 6%. Part of this would have been the result of electricity outages, but some of this is also certainly due to users switching to alternative energy sources. Non-payment is adversely affecting the working capital position of Johannesburg, which was R3 billion negative (shortfall) as at June 2018. Eskom’s annual report for the last year shows an arrears bill of nearly R17 billion in Soweto alone – this amount is not included in Johannesburg’s financial results.

Presenting the latest MFSI for 2018 on Tuesday, Claassen points out that only 23 of the top 100 municipalities in SA reported operating profits last year. The remaining 77 made combined operating losses of R13.3 billion and recorded a combined working capital shortfall of R23 billion. This means they have run out of cash and have stopped or delayed paying creditors.

Ratings Afrika’s MFSI uses a model that scores municipalities out of 100 based on operating performance, liabilities management, budget practices and liquidity.

Overall, the picture for municipalities is bleak and getting worse. The national average slipped below 40 to 38 for the first time since the index was calculated in 2012. Of the top 100 municipalities, 56 scored less than 35. Worst of the lot was Modimolle, formerly Nylstroom in Limpopo, which scored just 2 out of 100. It has virtually ceased to function and service delivery is almost non-existent – a recipe for protest and violence.

Redemption

Best of the lot is Swartland in the Western Cape with a score of 86. And herein lies a tale of redemption. When the index was first published in 2012, Swartland scored in the low 50s. After huffing and puffing about the low score, municipal managers asked what they should do to improve performance. “It came down to making basic financial corrections, such as reining in expenses, no new hires, improving revenue collection and implementing proper budgeting,” says Claassen.

Another municipality on the mend is Midvaal in Gauteng, whose score has improved from 53 to 72 over the last five years. It has consistently won clean audits from the Auditor General. In 2013 the ANC attempted to merge the DA-run Midvaal with the disastrous ANC-run Emfuleni in what was seen as a cynical attempt to capture the province’s best-run municipality. The attempted merger was defeated in the North Gauteng High Court in 2015.

Moving in the opposite direction is Msunduzi in KwaZulu-Natal, which was once rated among the best-managed municipalities in the country. All that has gone as new management took over, squandered the reserves, and let revenue and arrears collections go to the dogs.

The political question

How much does politics play in the management of municipalities?

Ratings Afrika director Charl Kocks relates the story of one metro that soft-peddled on arrears collections so as not to lose votes ahead of an election. The obvious solution seems to be to get professional managers in to run the municipalities, rather than using them as playthings for dispensing political favours.

The main revenue source for metros and municipalities is electricity sales, followed by water charges, refuse and sewage charges, and property tax.

“Given that the financial sustainability of key local municipalities in SA is weak, our expectation is that the quality of service delivery is likely to deteriorate over the short to medium term,” says Ratings Afrika. “Weak service delivery impacts quality of living as well as the economic growth and development that are desperately needed to reduce unemployment in the country.”

What differentiates the high-scoring municipalities from the weak are skills, experience, financial discipline and quality of management backed by sound governance.

https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/municipal-sector-faces-collapse-ratings-afrika/?fbclid=IwAR2kulCd_XLZWbFE6668QIMIgljXT9xq_dt3JPn_KD6zrUb8q43yl4BNYcg&via=Moneyweb"
 
Related articles:
 
 
 
 
Related Articles:

Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit is amptelik as die beste munisipaliteit op grond van lewenskwaliteit vir inwoners in die land aangewys in die jaarlikse Good Governance Africa (GGZ)-indeks vir 2019, terwyl Swartland wéér bo-aan Ratings Afrika se lys is vir finansiële stabiliteit. 

Volgens die GGZ-indeks is 12 van die beste provinsiale munisipaliteite in die land in die Wes-Kaap, terwyl die meerderheid van die swakste munisipaliteite in KwaZulu-Natal is.

Tweede is Senqu in die Lady Grey-omgewing in die Oos-Kaap, en derde is die Swartland-munisipaliteit, wat Malmesbury insluit, wat verlede jaar saam met Mosselbaai deur Ratings Afrika as die mees volhoubare munisipaliteit vir 2017 in die land aangewys is. 

  • Volgens die jongste Ratings Afrika-indeks oor munisipaliteite se finansiële stabiliteit is Swartland Munisipaliteit egter vanjaar wéér (alleen) bo-aan die lys met 86 punte, gevolg deur Senqu Munisipaliteit met 85 punte. Ratings Afrika se Munisipale Finansiële Stabiliteit-indeks assesseer hoe die land se munisipaliteite hul geld bestuur en watter invloed dit op dienslewering het. Die groep definieer finansiële stabiliteit as die vermoë tot dienslewering en die ontwikkeling en handhawing van infrastruktuur volgens inwoners se behoefte sonder onbeplande tarief- en belastingverhogings en 'n afname in die gehalte van dienslewering.
  • Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit het waarskynlik dié top-posisie in die jongste Ratings Afrika-indeks verloor nadat hy verlede jaar die eerste keer sy skoon oudit verloor het nadat hy ses jaar agtereenvolgens met 'n skoon oudit kon spog. Die nuwe voorgestelde begroting vir die 2019/20 finansiële boekjaar sluit ook drastiese verhogings vir eiendomsbelasting (15%), Vullisverwydering (15%) en Elektrisiteit 12,9 %) in. (Ratings Afrika-indeks onderaan). 

Good Governance Africa is 'n nuwe evalueringsindeks wat onlangs eers begin het om die welstand van munisipaliteite en hul inwoners op grond van verskillende kategorieë te bepaal. "The 2019 Government Performance Index is a continuation of GGA’s local government research, which began in 2016. This year, we were able to compare the state of South Africa’s municipalities with our previous index and have found a significant variation in the municipal landscape, and some shifts within the rankings." https://gga.org/programmes/#local_governance

Die Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit het die volgende verklaring uitgereik ná die bekendmaking van die GGZ-indeks.

Munisipale bestuurder Thys Giliomee het die raadslede, bestuur en alle amptenare geluk gewens en bedank vir hul harde werk, toewyding en lojaliteit aan die munisipaliteit en die mense van Mosselbaai. 

Mun beste in land

Wes-Kaapse munisipaliteite oorheers die lys van die top 20-munisipaliteite. 

Die res van die top 20-munisipaliteite is: 

4. Sol Plaatje - Noord-Kaap);

5. Groter Kokstad - KwaZulu-Natal);
6. Midvaal - Gauteng);
7. Khai-Ma - Noord-Kaap);
8. Bergrivier - Wes-Kaap);
9. Kaap Agulhas - Wes-Kaap);
10. Prins Albert - Wes-Kaap);
11. Swellendam - Wes-Kaap);
12. Cederberg - Wes-Kaap);
13. Matzikama - Wes-Kaap);
14. Overstrand - Wes-Kaap);
15. Witzenberg - Wes-Kaap);
16. Koukamma - Oos-Kaap);
17. Hantam - Wes-Kaap);
18. Nama Khoi - Noord-Kaap);
19. Hessequa - Wes-Kaap); en
20. Langeberg - Wes-Kaap).

 

Indeks



Dr. Ivan Meyer, LUR vir finansies, het gesê die verslag bevestig die goeie finansiële vertoning van munisipaliteite in die Wes-Kaap en wys die band tussen goeie finansiële bestuur en ’n munisipaliteit se vermoë om gehaltediens aan inwoners te lewer. 

Die GGA neem drie faktore in - die gehalte van die administrasie, ekonomiese ontwikkeling en dienslewering.

Inligting wat deur GGA gebruik word, sluit in data van Statistieke Suid-Afrika, verslae van die ouditeurgeneraal, inligting wat die munisipaliteite self verskaf en verslae van die nasionale tesourie.

Van die agt metrorade het die Kaapstadse metro die beste gevaar. Dit is 43ste op die ranglys van al die munisipaliteite. Die ander metrorade het as volg gevaar: Buffalostad (60); Nelson Mandelabaai (61); Ekurhuleni (69); Johannesburg (70); eThekwini (71); Tshwane (90) en Mangaung (91).

Die drie swakste munisipaliteite is Msinga (ANC, KwaZulu-Natal) in die eerste plek, gevolg deur uMhlabuyalingana (ANC, KwaZulu-Natal) en Port St. Johns (ANC, Oos-Kaap).

Lees ook: 

http://www.mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/mossel-bay-most-sustainable-municipality-in-the-country

Ratings Afrika het Swartland Munisipaliteit vanjaar egter weer bo-aan die lys vir beste finansiële bestuur, gevolg deur Senqu (Lady Grey): 

These are the best and worst run municipalities in South Africa

18 April 2019

Two new independent reports have been published which assess the financial stability, and governance of South Africa’s municipalities.

The Municipal Financial Stability Index published by Ratings Afrika, assesses how the country’s municipalities manage their money, and how this impacts service delivery in those areas.

The group defines financial stability as the ability to deliver services, develop and maintain the infrastructure required by its residents without unplanned increases in rates and taxes or a reduction in the level of services.

It also means a municipality is able to absorb financial shocks caused by external factors, without needing financial assistance from third parties.

To determine the top and bottom performers in this index, Ratings Afrika assessed the financial statements of municipalities to June 2018, as reported to National Treasury.

Worryingly, the 2018 index found that most of the municipalities in South Africa are in financial distress, lacking proper budget planning and not exercising adequate fiscal discipline, with expenses exceeding income and resulting in losses.

“Only 23 municipalities from the sample of 100 have reported operating surpluses, with the remaining 77 reporting operating deficits,” Ratings Afrika said.

“The combined profits of those with a surplus amount to only R1.4 billion, whereas the combined losses amount to R13.3 billion.”

Further, the combined working capital shortfall for the sample was R23 billion – making it almost impossible for these municipalities to provide any services, it said.

“This might lead to a total breakdown in service delivery, with catastrophic consequences for residents and businesses, which in turn could encourage political unrest.”

Looking at specific areas, the weakest provinces are Free State and North West, with average scores of 17 and 24 respectively. The majority of the municipalities in these provinces are in serious financial trouble, the group said.

The Western Cape, with an average of 63, is the highest scoring province and it is also the province that has improved the most over the last five years, from 52 in 2014 to 63 in 2018. Western Cape is the only province whose governance practices are considered to be sound.

The tables below show the best and worst municipalities in each province:

 

 Best and worst-run municipalities

A second report, Government Performance Index for 2019, comes from think-tank Good Governance Africa (GGA).

GGA’s index ranks 213 local municipalities from best to worst based on how they deliver across three main indicators: quality of administration, economic development, and service delivery.

In the group’s analysis it looked at whether a municipality has enough skilled personnel to manage the running of the area, and how it delivers on services like providing water, sanitation, education, electricity, housing, waste removal, healthcare and policing.

Financial management and reporting is also analysed.

According to the GGA index, Mossel Bay municipality is the best-run municipality in the country, followed by the Senqu municipality in the Eastern Cape.

Of the top 20 municipalities, 12 are in the Western Cape, and 11 are run by the Democratic Alliance, with four others being DA/other party coalitions.

On the opposite end of the scales, Msinga municipality in KwaZulu Natal was ranked as the worst-run in the country, below uMhlabuyalingana in the same province.

Among the bottom 20 municipalities, nine are found in KwaZulu Natal, and seven are in the Eastern Cape. Most are ANC-led, with the IFP running four of them.

According to Ratings Afrika, the South African municipal sector is currently facing collapse – and correction will require decisive political leadership that looks after the interests of the residents including that of the business community.

While not mentioning the ANC by name, the group said that the current political leadership in control of the majority of municipalities has demonstrated over the last five years and more to not being capable of sound governance.

“This is the main cause of the deteriorating financial sustainability of the municipal sector in South Africa,” it said.

It suggested that leaders stop looking after their own interests, root out corruption, appoint managers with the right skills and experience to implement sound budgetary practices, and exercise strict financial discipline.

Also read:http://www.mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/residents-urged-to-boycott-property-taxes

  

Related Articles:

Die ATKV-kampeerterrein in Hartenbos het sy vuurdoop om 4 300 vurige Buffalo Rally-ryers te huisves, blykbaar met vlieënde vaandels geslaag . . . en die Buffers is gek oor die plek!  

Dit was die naweek die 14de agtereenvolgende jaar wat die gewilde Buffalo Rally in Mosselbaai plaasgevind het, maar die eerste keer dat die Buffers op Hartenbos tuisgaan sedert die Santos/De Bakke-kampeerterrein onder private bestuur is en nie meer die ryers kan huisves nie

Die aanvanklike kommer en besware het Saterdag egter letterlik soos die vorige aand se mis en reënwolke voor die son verdwyn toe die ysterperdryers eers hul voete gevind en die omgewing verken het.  Die weer het boonop saamgespeel en die duisende baaikers van regoor die land met tipiese Mosselbaaise son, see en saffier begroet . . . 

Buff2019 Advertiser

Die Buffalo-ryers het gou hul voete gevind in die ATKV-kampeerterrein op Hartenbos. Foto: MB Advertiser. 

"Ons was aanvanklik vies en baie teleurgesteld dat ons nie meer in De Bakke sou tuisgaan nie omdat ons die plek al so goed leer ken het, maar ná die eerste dag se rondvallery om ons "bearings" by die nuwe kampplek te kry, verkies baie van ons eintlik die Hartenbos-terrein omdat alles daar bymekaar is en loopafstand is van winkels en ander geriewe," het 'n groep Kaapse Buffers gesê. 

buff2019 Hein Boshoff

Hoewel die roete van die pretrit vanjaar ietwat verander is, was die tradisionele rit om die Punt weer 'n hoogtepunt. Foto: Hein Boshoff

 Die organiseerders, die Nomads Motorfietsklub, het weer gesorg vir puik organisasie in samewerking met plaaslike owerhede om verkeersveiligheid en orde te handhaaf. Van die hoogtepunte was die kroning van Mej. Buffalo 2019 wat vanjaar deur 'n besoeker van Finland, die pragtige Sara Kauranen, gewen is. 'n Plaaslike Buffer, Bernard Claassen, was die gelukkige wenner van die reuse-kontantprys van R135 000 wat vanjaar op die  spel was.

Buff2019 2

Hoe gelukkig kan een man wees? Bernard Claassen van Mosselbaai word hier deur die beeldskone Mej. Buffalo 2019, Sara Kauranen, geluk gewens met sy droom-kontantprys van R135 000. Abigail Andreas en Shanley van der Merwe was onderskeidelik die eerste en tweede Mej. Buffalo-prinsesse. Grey Stopforth het die foto geneem.

buff2019 18

Die Buffalo-ryers is trots op hul onderskeie motorfietsklubs - soos dié Buffers van die Ulysses-klub in Upington hier wys.

buff2019 12

Die Buffers het heerlik gekuier en opnuut ou baaiker-bande hernu en nuwes gesmee . . . 

buff2019 29

'n Heerlike feesgees het deurentyd geheers en by die biertuin op die ATKV-terrein was dit heeltyd speeltyd . . . 

Só het ons op ons Facebad-blad berig: 

Die 14de Buffalo Rally in Mosselbaai wat vanjaar die eerste keer by die ATKV-oord in Hartenbos gehou is, was volgens alle aanduidings weer 'n DAWERENDE sukses met sowat 4 300 brulperdryers wat vanaf alle uithoeke in die land tot Namibië op Mosselbaai toegesak het vir dié jaarlikse hoogtepunt op die baaiker-kalender . . .

buff2019 6

Brulperde RAAS en hul ryers REV daai masjiene en inwoners van die rustige Hartenbos-kusdorpie het met gemengde gevoelens die vrolike, kleurryke klomp Buffers gade geslaan wat die naweek hul rustige bestaan kom binneval het . . .

Die Buffalo "padbuffels" het egter hul nuwe kampeerterrein in Hartenbos baie geniet en die meeste ryers met wie mosselbayontheline gesels het, het laat blyk hulle verkies eintlik die nuwe oord bo De Bakke omdat "alles so gerieflik bymekaar is" en boonop naby winkels en ander geriewe is . . . 
Mornay Beukes, Hartenbos ATKV se oordbestuurder, het gister 'n dankbare sug van verligting geslaag dat die eerste Rally by dié oord "bo verwagting goed en sonder enige ernstige voorvalle" afgeloop het.

"Ons was maar bekommerd . . . Dit is 'n groot uitdaging om so 'n klomp uitbundige motorfietsryers 'n naweek lank te huisves, maar benewens die geraas-faktor waaraan ons vorentoe beslis aandag sal moet skenk, het alles besonder goed afgeloop en ons is baie dankbaar", het hy gesê.

En wat sê die baaikers? "Dit was uitsonderlik lekker en al was ons bekommerd oor die reënweer wat voorspel is, het Mosselbaai weer sy reputasie gestand gedoen as die dorp met van die lekkerste klimaat en mense in die wêreld!"

Mooi so, Mosselbaai/Hartenbos/Buffers! 
Ons wens al die Buffers 'n veilige terugreis huis toe - en kom weer volgende jaar!

Kyk ook die videos onder die kommentare. Klik op die skakels vir nog foto's en videos. 

https://web.facebook.com/mosselbayontheline/posts/2379330828964837?

Hartenbossers het die naweek die "voorreg" gehad om eerste die "magtige dreuning" van sowat 4 300 kragtige ysterperde te beleef . . .

Die buffers het van van alle uithoeke in die land gekom en soos gewoonlik, het Mosselbaai sy dreigende reën- en wolkekombers weer oopgetrek om die besoekers met tipiese Mosselbaaise gasvryheid, sonskynweer en wêreldberoemde natuurskoon te verwelkom vir 'n baie geslaagde Buffalo Rally 2019 by die ATKV-oord in Hartenbos . . .

Mense soek deesdae nie lang stories nie, so ons plaas soos gebruiklik weer die nuus stuk-stuk in beeld vir dié wat dit misgeloop het . . . 
Só het dit gister gelyk by die wegspringpunt vir die massa-rit vanaf Hartenbos na die Punt . . . en Hartenbos sal glo NOOIT weer dieselfde wees nie 

https://web.facebook.com/mosselbayontheline/posts/2379311158966804?

 
 
  • Baie Hartenbossers weet glo nie WAT hulle die naweek getref het nie . . . maar die baaikers glo die klakouse gaan nog baie lief raak vir hulle namate hulle die Buffers leer ken . . . 
Andé Lombard het 'n paar lukrake videotjies van die Buffer-brigade geneem vir dié wat dit misgeloop het:

https://web.facebook.com/…/pcb.10212033…/10212033211620435/…

https://web.facebook.com/…/pcb.10212033…/10212033213260476/…

https://web.facebook.com/…/pcb.10212033…/10212033212260451/…

Related Articles:

Munisipaliteite melk gapings in die wet

Die parlement faal grond- en eiendomsbesitters – en daarmee saam ons land – deur eerstens wetgewing voor te skryf wat ‘herverdeling' en ‘regstelling' bo basiese dienslewering stel, en tweedens deur plaaslike owerhede vrye teuels met tariefbepalings te gee. JURIE DE WET meen dis sy en ander prokureurs se plig om die wet tot voordeel van vooruitgang in ons land te gebruik.

Photo of suburbs

Die burgemeester van ’n dorpie in Mpumalanga het my ’n ruk gelede genader om sy munisipaliteit te help om ’n groot mynmaatskappy se agterstallige tariewe in te vorder, en ek het ingestem om te help.

Uit die dokumentasie het dit geblyk dat die myn altesaam R9 miljoen geskuld het vir tariewe wat op sy eiendom gehef is – die munisipaliteit het dié eiendom vir R25 miljoen gewaardeer.

Munisipale tariewe is belasting wat op eiendom binne die munisipale gebied gehef word volgens ’n sent-in-die-rand-tarief wat deur die munisipale raad bepaal word. Verskillende tariewe geld verskillende tipes eiendom – handels- en kommersiële eiendomme word byvoorbeeld altyd teen hoër tariewe as residensiële eiendomme of skole en kerke belas.

Tot ’n paar jaar gelede is slegs eiendom wat binne die munisipale grense geval het, belas, maar ná 1994 is besluit om die grense geleidelik uit te brei totdat die hele land eindelik deur munisipaliteite gedek is.

Dié uitbreiding was in ooreenstemming met die visie van die opstellers van die Grondwet wat verwag het dat die plaaslike regering ’n kragtige instrument sou wees wat demokrasie, dienslewering en ontwikkeling betref.

Gevolglik kon munisipaliteite nou vir die eerste keer plase en ander eiendomme belas wat voorheen buite hulle grense geval het.

Die moontlikheid van strawwe munisipale tariewe vir dienslewering wat nie tot by hulle strek nie, het georganiseerde landbou genoodsaak om die regering se hulp in te roep. In 2009 het die kabinet gehoor gegee en is ’n regulasie goedgekeur wat munisipaliteite verbied om landbou-eiendomme met meer as ’n kwart van die vasgestelde tarief vir residensiële eiendomme te belas.

Dit het beteken dat plaaslike politici nie die tariewe op plaaseiendomme kon verhoog sonder om ook die tarief vir residensiële eiendomme te verhoog nie. Aangesien hulle self huiseienaars is, was die hoop dat hulle enige verhogings sou beperk.

‘Min inwoners was in staat of bereid om vir dienste te betaal, wat die munisipaliteit verder geknou het. Hulle was dus nog altyd van staatstoelae afhanklik.’

Die nuwe beperking het egter nie wild- of ekotoerismeplase gegeld nie. Trouens, dié eiendomme is uitdruklik by die definisie van landbou uitgesluit. Dit het ook nie myn-, handel-, kommersiële of industriële eiendomme ingesluit nie. Munisipaliteite kon dié eiendomme vryelik belas – en hulle het.

Die betrokke munisipaliteit in Mpumalanga het gemeen mynbase is ryk en moet meer tot die gemeenskap bydra. Daar is dus besluit om myneiendomme teen 20,9 sent in die rand te belas – hierteenoor is die Emalahleni-munisipaliteit (Witbank) se tarief byvoorbeeld 1,69 sent in die rand.

Dit het beteken dat die myn jaarliks 20,9% van die markwaarde van sy eiendom in tariewe sou moes betaal – meer as dubbel as wat ’n bank sou vra op ’n lening om dié eiendom te koop.

Dis daarom verstaanbaar waarom die myn geweier het om te betaal, en dit was ’n uitdaging vir my om te motiveer hoekom hulle móés betaal.

Gelukkig vir die myn het die munisipaliteit nie die regte prosedure gevolg om die tariefbepaling te adverteer en te publiseer nie, en die bepaling was dus ongeldig. Die saak is beslis met die ooreenkoms dat die myn sy agterstallige en huidige tariewe teen 2,9 sent in die rand sou betaal, volgens wat Rustenburg se munisipaliteit vra.

Nog ’n gelukskoot was dat die munisipale waardeerder nie die eiendom volgens die mynreg gewaardeer het nie, wat hy kragtens artikel 46(2)(a) van die Wet op Munisipale Eiendomsbelasting (2004) geregtig was om te doen. As hy dit reg gewaardeer het, sou die belasbare waarde nader aan R500 miljoen gewees het. Ek het dit egter na goeddunke met niemand gedeel nie.

Ander munisipaliteite in die nood het ook die geleentheid benut om hulle belastingbasis uit te brei en hulle inkomste te vermeerder.

Die Bosbokrand-munisipaliteit (BBR) is een só ʼn voorbeeld.

Die tariefbasis in trustgebiede is klein omdat min mense in besit van titelaktes is.
TITEL ... Die tariefbasis in trustgebiede is klein omdat min mense in besit van titelaktes is. 
123RF/SAMPOB TAPAOPOND

Omdat dit in die destydse selfregerende Gazankulu-gebied geleë is en hoofsaaklik deur sogenaamde trustgebiede omring word waar titelaktes die uitsondering is, was dié munisipaliteit se tariefbasis nog altyd klein.

Min inwoners was in staat of bereid om vir dienste te betaal, wat die munisipaliteit verder geknou het. Hulle was dus nog altyd van staatstoelae afhanklik.

BBR het ’n begrote inkomste van sowat R1.6 miljard: R74 miljoen kom van dienste gelewer en R186 miljoen van eiendomstariewe van sowat 23,000 belasbare eiendomme. Die balans van ongeveer R1,36 miljard word deur staatstoelae en -toekennings gedek.

Van die tariefinkomste is 35% van tariewe wat op handels- en residensiële eiendomme gehef word en 2,5% van tariewe op landbou-eiendomme. Die grootste bydraers is egter die eienaars van private wildreservate teen die westelike grens van die Krugerwildtuin.

Sowat 96 eienaars van private wildlodges betaal 57% van BBR se totale tariefinkomste en die eienaars van private huise in dié reservate betaal ’n verdere 3.5%.

BBR belas kommersiële wildlodges teen 3.9 sent in die rand. Die eienaars van ’n paar van die toplodges wat hulle op internasionale gaste toespits moet dus R330,00 per maand vir munisipale tariewe opdok. Die kostes van minder luukse lodges wat meer op die plaaslike mark fokus, kan ongeveer R65,000 per maand beloop. Vir baie is dit eenvoudig onbekostigbaar.

Die tarief is boonop dieselfde as dié waarmee handels-, kommersiële en industriële eiendomme in BBR se sakekern belas word – dis eiendomme wat water, elektrisiteit, sanitasie, vullisverwydering, paaie en ander maatskaplike dienste van die raad ontvang, terwyl die wildlodges niks daarvan geniet nie. Hulle bou en onderhou selfs hulle eie paaie.

                        ‘Hofsake teen onredelike tariefbepalings was tot dusver meestal onsuksesvol.’
 
Dan is daar nog die moontlikheid van ekstra tariewe wat gehef kan word. Hoewel geproklameerde wildreservate “beskermde gebiede” is en daarom van munisipale tariewe vrygestel word, is daar baie eiendomme in die groter Krugerwildtuingebied wat nie verklaarde reservate is nie. Dié eiendomme kan ook belas word.

Die vrystelling van tariewe vir beskermde gebiede geld net eiendom wat nie vir kommersiële doeleindes gebruik word nie. Die dele wat deur besoekers deurkruis word, kan stellig ook belas word. Met grondwaardes van meer as R40,000 per hektaar kan die potensiële tariewe tot honderde miljoene beloop. Baie grondeienaars sal eenvoudig nie meer kan bekostig om hulle grond te besit nie.

Grond wat aan grondeisbegunstigdes teruggegee is, word vir die eerste 10 jaar ná die oordrag van munisipale tariewe vrygestel. Sonder hierdie vrystelling sou die grondeisers wat nou die Mala Mala-wildreservaat besit egter in groot moeilikheid gewees het, want hulle munisipale rekening is baie meer as die huur wat hulle van hulle kommersiële huurder kry.

My kliënte wil hierdie buitensporige tariewe betwis, maar dis ongelukkig makliker gesê as gedaan.

Wanneer ’n munisipaliteit sy begroting en tariefbeleid goedkeur, is hy besig om wetgewing neer te lê. Howe stel nie graag wetgewing tersyde behalwe wanneer daardie wet die Handves van Menseregte oortree nie. En dis nie hiér die geval nie. Dis dalk onregverdig, maar daar is geen voorwaarde in die handves wat die wetgewende liggaam se gesag beperk om swaar tariewe te hef nie – BTW staan immers op 15%.

Hofsake teen onredelike tariefbepalings was tot dusver meestal onsuksesvol. ’n Senior advokaat het my vertel dat die konstitusionele hof ’n groot aanhanger van die plaaslike regerings is; die regters pak hulle met sagte handskoentjies aan.

Die handjievol suksesvolle sake is op grond van prosedurekwessies gewen, nie weens die redelikheid of die tariefbepalings self nie. Wat is so onregverdig daaraan om die rykes ter wille van gelykheid en regstelling te belas, vra hulle.

Dit beteken die munisipaliteit (en parlement) het feitlik vrye mag om eiendomsbelasting te hef en kan dié tariewe oplê soos hulle goeddink. Die gevolge is skrikwekkend en so duidelik soos daglig.

  • Hoë tariewe ontmoedig grondbesitting. Hoekom sal jy grond wil besit as die tariewe jou tot armoede kan dryf? Dis beter om op informele eiendomsreg staat te maak wat nie gewoonlik belas word nie. En selfs al word dit belas, kan ’n krediteur nie teen informele grondregte eksekuteer soos wat hulle met private eiendom kan doen nie. Dis hoekom so baie bendelede en ander misdadigers sulke tamaai huise in stamdistrikte bou waar die lang arm van die gereg hulle nie kan bykom nie.

  • Hoë tariewe ontmoedig ook mense om in hulle eiendom te belê. Hoekom sal ’n grondbesitter R100 miljoen bestee om sy internasionale wildlogde op te knap as dit hom jaarliks nog R3.9 miljoen in tariewe gaan kos? Dis beter om nie verbeteringe aan te bring nie en die bestaande bate se waarde te laat afneem.
'n Plaasstal naby Vredendal aan die Weskus
GRONDBESIT ... 'n Plaasstal naby Vredendal aan die Weskus 
123RF/GROBLER DU PREEZ

’n Boer wat ’n gastehuis of padstal op sy plaas wil bou, of ’n fabriek om sy melk of grane te verwerk, kan boonop deur nog swaar tariewe volgens die kommersiële of industriële skaal belas word.

  • Hoë munisipale tariewe het veroorsaak dat baie huiseienaars in plattelandse dorpe hulle eiendom moes prysgee omdat die agteruitgang van die plattelandse ekonomie hulle so verarm het dat hulle nie die munisipale tariewe en dienste kon bekostig nie. Dit lei tot ’n ineenstorting van eiendomspryse en dra tot die ekonomiese en maatskaplike agteruitgang by.
  • Hoë munisipale tariewe skep ’n kultuur van niebetaling omdat mense eenvoudig nie die regulasies na kom nie. Munisipaliteite se inkomste droog op ondanks die feit dat hulle die tariewe verhoog. Dis soortgelyk aan die situasie met Eskom se tariefverhogings wat veroorsaak dat dié kragvoorsiener se inkomste afneem, en aan die manier waarop hoë sondebelasting tot grootskaalse sigaretsmokkelary, belastingontduiking en toenemende verliese aan die staatskas gelei het.
  • In ’n rasverdeelde en ongelyke samelewing soos ons s’n word hoë munisipale tariewe en belasting oneweredig op die “ryk” minderheid gerig wat eiendomme met titelaktes en hulle eie ondernemings besit.

Hoewel dié fokus op grond van ideologiese redes – vir herverdeling of regstelling – geregverdig kan word, het dit hoegenaamd nie dié uitwerking nie.

In werklikheid veroorsaak dit dat die minderheid die pad vat, en dit laat ’n gebrek aan vaardigheid en ekonomie waarvoor geen mate van herverdeling of regstelling kan vergoed nie.

Die verantwoordelikheid van hierdie kortsigtige benadering tot tariewe lê in die eerste plek by die parlement.

Die parlement het doelbewus ’n wet voorgeskryf wat ’n gaping skep tussen die tariewe wat gehef kan word, en die werklike dienste wat gelewer word. Dit gaan nie oor betaling vir dienslewering nie, maar oor “herverdeling” of “regstelling”, en soos reeds genoem, is die gevolge skokkend.

Die ideologiese uitkyk is ook duidelik in die uitdruklike uitsluiting van wildplase en eiendomme wat vir ekotoerisme gebruik word onder die definisie van “landbou”. Die regerende party is al lank gekant teen wildplase en grond wat vir jag of bewaringsdoeleindes gebruik word omdat dit – in ’n konteks van grootskaalse grondloosheid – as wit, onproduktiewe, verkwistende en genotsugtige gebruike vir grond beskou word.

Die parlement is ook onder ’n wanindruk van die vermoë en bekwaamheid waaroor hulle dink die plaaslike regering beskik. In die meeste klein dorpe en baie stede laat die gehalte van die bestuur veel te wense oor.

Baie indien nie die meeste plaaslike owerhede nie is nie in staat om die dienste te lewer en die leiers van maatskaplike en ekonomiese ontwikkeling te wees wat hulle veronderstel is om te wees nie. Inteendeel, hulle is korrup, omkoopbaar en onbevoeg. Gevolglik hou hulle aan om groot en blywende skade aan plaaslike ekonomieë en aan ons samelewing as ’n geheel aan te rig.

Ons rol as vooruitstrewende prokureurs is om die skade te beperk, om die establishment-narratief omver te werp, en om die moontlikhede te ondersoek waarop die wet gebruik kan word om dinge te ontwrig en verandering teweeg te bring.

Jurie de Wet

Related Articles:

Irate and cash strapped ratepayers, pensioners and property owners slammed the Mossel Bay Municipality's proposed Draft Budget for the 2019/2020 financial year - especially the proposed 15% increase in property rates - as "shocking, scandalous and nothing but a wealth tax to milk a few for the benefit of non-paying masses."

An appeal was also made to property owners to boycott all property taxes.

Residents didn't mince their words in forceful letters to the media to express their shock and disappointment regarding the "thoughtless and cruel" price hikes that will bleed them dry.
"I dare say your council cannot be trusted with the welfare of all of Mossel Bay's residents. You cannot keep on taxing the few for the benefit of the non-paying masses."

"Wel, hierdie cash cow gaan nie verder betaal nie, en ek doen 'n beroep op ander inwoners om ook geen verdere belasting op eiendomswaarde te betaal nie. Betaal wel vir dienste."

taxpayers

The vexed Draft Budget that was recently tabled to, and conditionally accepted by the Mossel Bay Council, and the steep increases for Electricity (12,9 %); Refuse (15 %), and Property Rates (15%) immediately caused a public outcry. 

The documents with the proposed tariffs have been made public on the Municipality's website https://www.mosselbay.gov.za/resource-category/budget?page=full and the public is urged to submit comments in writing to the municipal manager on the proposed increases and the draft budget.

"All comments received from the public will be considered during the process of setting tariffs and finalising the budget for the next financial year. The final document will be tabled to council for approval", reads a statement from municipal manager Thys Giliomee.  

Property owners were also urged to check their municipal property valuation before the deadline for objections at the end of April.

The Supplementary Valuation Roll for the 2018/2019 financial year is open for public inspection on the fourth floor, Valuation Division, Montagu Place Building, Montagu Street, Mossel Bay from 1 April until 30 April. The closing date for the lodging of objections about individual property valuations is Tuesday, 30 April 2019.

Angry residents did not beat about the bush in strong-worded letters against the proposed tariff increases. In one of the letters published in the Mossel Bay Advertiser, a reader wrote:

Learn from the Poor: 

"Do not be duped into accepting the latest property valuations, nor the 15% tax increase on property rates.

Take cognisance of the experience of the ageing population of the Bo-Kaap, where property valuations unexpectedly jumped millions of rands, leading to a dramatic increase in rates and taxes.

What safeguards Mossel Bay's residents from a similar experience?

If the bulk of municipal income suddenly comes primarily from taxes on property rates, what measures are in place to safeguard the fixed-income pensioners from dramatic increases in property valuations?

They retired here because of the DA-led council's policy of several years' marketing the town as the ideal place to invest their retirement nest egg. Mossel Bay, like Cape Town is DA-run. These retirees who bought property here are not on SASSA; they do not all qualify for SASSA, the municipal subsidy or discounts.

They do, however, run the risk of losing their homes when in the long run the municipal property valuation for the home they own outstrip their ability to meet the taxes levied.

The cash strapped - and especially older people - can still cut down on water and electricity consumption but will not be able to escape the property tax.

Learn from the reality of the poor in Mossel Bay, whose water is placed on drip when in arrears and whose municipal service charges debt is deducted off their prepaid electricity purchases.

The dramatic tax increase on property rates is nothing but a wealth tax. Municipal income from electricity is no longer guaranteed, so the municipality needs a different cash cow.

I can almost guarantee you the additional tax you pay on the increased value of your property will not be spent on any upgrades in the area you live. Do you have a clinic or library where you live?

What you do have is a municipality which cannot, or refuses to control illegal land grabs such as at the pig farm; which doesn't act against illegal squatters on municipal land, nor their illegal use of electricity; which has taken away your free electricity, only to give it to the people who pay for neither taxes nor services." 

Logo Mossel Bay Municipality

 

Mossel Bay Mayor Harry Levendal said in his Budget speech although the Municipality did not achieve a clean audit outcome for the 2017/2018 financial year, it maintained an unqualified audit opinion. Despite this regression in the audit outcome, the municipality still maintains strict financial discipline and is geared to address the issues highlighted by the Auditor General.

Harry Levendal

"The 2019/2020 budget is again focussed on service delivery and the community was consulted on their needs through the IDP processes. Through the ongoing and successful execution of the Ward Discretionary Funding Model, the Municipality can make the needed infrastructure development and service improvement to all fourteen wards. In addition, the management team provided guidance on what is necessary to maintain as well as expand infrastructure to be able to cope with future growth of Mossel Bay.

The proposed increase for electricity is 12.9 per cent, which is the percentage that NERSA allows municipalities to increase their electricity tariffs by. The increase for refuse charges consists of an increase of 15 per cent, which is the third of approximately four increases that will be above the inflation increase. The 15 per cent tariff increase is to contribute to the costs of the proposed new regional landfill facility for the Garden Route District municipal area. Property rates will increase with 15 per cent for residential properties. The water and sewerage tariffs increased respectively by 1 per cent.

It also had to be considered that the Municipality is reliant on its ratepayers and users of municipal services for the bulk of its income. The latter cannot be burdened beyond their means to increase the Municipality’s income so that all demands or requests raised during the community participation processes, can be met. There is therefore bound to be some disappointments."

The total proposed budget for 2019/20 amounts to R 1,450,104,573.

This consists of a capital budget of R 277 904 795 and an operating budget of R 1,172,199,778.

The capital budget amounts to 19.2 per cent of the total budget and the operating budget to 80.8 per cent of the total budget.

The following paragraph also evoked some serious reactions in the light of the municipality's alleged wastage of taxpayers' money on unnecessary, costly projects and the appointment of consultants for issues that should be addressed by the huge and well-paid staff corps themselves. The "unnecessary parking and boardwalks on the dunes along Beyers Street, as well as the appointment of a multi-disciplinary team to develop a framework for a new proposed Tourist Route in the CBD, were mentioned in this regard, especially since a complete study and formal proposal for such a Tourist Route apparently have been done already at great cost by the Tourism Bureau a few years ago.       

It must be emphasised that it is of absolute importance that capital projects need to be prioritised to ensure that available funds are allocated towards the most important projects. A municipality will always have the challenge to allocate its limited resources amongst the vast needs of its community.

 The proposed capital budget shows an increase of 35.1 per cent compared to the revised capital budget for 2018/19. The 2019/20 capital budget will be allocated mainly to:

Technical Services R 142.3 million;

Community Services R 22.6 million; 

Planning & Integrated Services R 101.2 million. 

 

The capital budget will be funded with an amount of R 105.98 million from the Capital Replacement Reserve, while the balance will be funded from external sources. Human Settlements funding of R 30.10 million and external loans of R 103.70 million will be the biggest source of external funding.

It is acknowledged that the funding of the Operational budget in the outer years as well as the levels of financing capital budgets from the Capital Replacement Reserve, are slightly above Council’s policy.

Management has been tasked to revisit this as part of the community participation process and table a more credible budget within the acceptable levels to the budget steering committee for consideration together with the tabling of the budget for consideration.

https://www.mosselbay.gov.za/resource-category/budget?page=full

 

taxpayers1

Budget: What about us pensioners?

State pensioner, writes:

Dear Mayor Levendal

I am a pensioner on a fixed income. I bought my house many years ago and worked very hard to pay off the building society loan so that I might have a peaceful retirement.

Now I am faced with increased taxes on the value that your municipality has ascribed to my humble abode.

How can I trust you that the increase of 15% this year will not be repeated - or worse, in itself increase next year and the next? What proof do I have that the property valuation will not in future be manipulated to gift you the income you so desire?

I am appalled that your council could approve the proposed increases. Clearly you are out of touch with your electorate.

I remind you that the bare minimum of free electricity was also taken from us recently, so what is next?

I dare say your council cannot be trusted with the welfare of all of Mossel Bay's residents. You cannot keep on taxing the few for the benefit of the non-paying masses.

Do not tell me that I can apply for a pensioner's benefit as I - only just - do not qualify.

I urge you, mayor, to reconsider the effect of the proposed budget on the very many folks on a fixed income in this town.

https://www.mosselbayadvertiser.com/Letters/View/budget-what-about-us-pensioners-201904110356

Another reader wrote: https://www.mosselbayadvertiser.com/Letters/View/boikot-belastings-betaal-vir-dienste-gelewer-201904110344

Also read: https://www.mosselbayadvertiser.com/News/Article/General/municipal-increases-set-to-pinch-201904021035

 * Interesting that the danger of municipalities' Carte Blanche with property valuation and taxes was highlighted decades ago already . . .  

 

 

Related Articles: