Oyster World Delfinos.Passion for food-Passion for life Ponto Grille and Carvery Property Pointer Reflexions Professional Hair Top Up Service Station Wolwedans Game Farm Skorpios Security Beach House Restaurant

 

MosselbayonTheline | First With The News

Crucial excerpts from the Frontline Doctors' 67 page Covid watershed court document to STOP the mass experimentation on humans, and their expert reasons therefore, backed by hundreds of thousands of doctors globally.
Maybe every single person should first STUDY this document before they blindly yield to the biggest global media-driven propaganda campaign and falsehoods in history. (Due to the lengthy document, some of the information has been published as photo captions under the photos for easier reading):
* COVID recovered patients are at extremely high risk to a vaccine. They retain an antigenic fingerprint of natural infection in their tissues. They have all the requisite components of immune memory. Vaccination may activate a hyperimmune response leading to a significant tissue injury and possibly death.
* The true number of deaths caused by the Vaccines is at least 45,000. In the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign (in which 25% of the U.S. population at that time, 55 million Americans, were vaccinated), the Swine Flu vaccine was deemed dangerous and unsafe, and removed from the market, even though the vaccine resulted in only 53 deaths.
* Asymptomatic transmission:
On September 9, 2020, Dr. Fauci was forced to admit in an official press conference:
[E]ven if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person, even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.7
* NO emergency:
The emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal, since in fact there is no underlying emergency. Assuming the accuracy of Defendants’ COVID-19 death data, SARSCoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately inflated.
On March 24, 2020, DHHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations — exclusively for COVID-19. The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death
certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
In fact, DHHS statistics show that 95% of deaths classed as “COVID-19 deaths” involve an average of four additional co-morbidities. The CDC knew “…the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”
Similarly, the actual number of COVID-19 “cases” is far lower than the reported number.
DHHS authorized the emergency use of the polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19, with disastrous consequences. The PCR tests are themselves
experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. PCR test manufacturers use disclaimers like this in their product manuals: “[t]he FDA has not determined that the test is
safe or effective for the detection of SARS-Co-V-2.”
* No vaccine benefits
There are several factors that reduce any purported benefit of the COVID-19 Vaccines.
First, it is important to note that the Vaccines were only shown to reduce symptoms – not block transmission. For over a year now, these Defendants and state-level public health authorities have told the American public that SARS-CoV-2 can be spread by people who have none of the symptoms of COVID-19, therefore Americans must mask themselves, and submit to innumerable lockdowns and restrictions, even though they are not manifestly sick.
If that is the case, and these officials were not lying to the public, and asymptomatic spread is real, then what is the benefit of a vaccine that merely reduces symptoms? There isn’t any.
* Vaccine Rush
This 10-15 year testing process has been abandoned for purposes of the Vaccines. The first human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not confirmed until January 20, 2020, and less than a year later both mRNA Vaccines had EUAs and for the first time in history this novel mRNA technology was being injected into millions of human beings. As of June 7, 2021, 138 million Americans, representing 42% of the population, have been fully
vaccinated.
All of the stages of testing have been compressed in time, abbreviated in substance, and are overlapping, which dramatically increases the risks of the Vaccines. Plaintiffs’ investigation
indicates that Moderna and Pfizer designed their Vaccines in only two days. It appears that pharmaceutical companies did not independently verify the genome sequence that China released
on January 11, 2020. It appears that the Vaccines were studied for only 56 days in macaques, and 28 days in mice, and then animal studies were halted. It appears that the pharmaceutical
companies discarded their control groups receiving placebos, squandering the opportunity to learn about the rate of long-term complications, how long protection against the disease lasts and
how well the Vaccines inhibit transmission. A number of studies were deemed unnecessary and not performed prior to administration in human subjects, including single dose toxicity,
toxicokinetic, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, prenatal and postnatal development, offspring, local tolerance, teratogenic and postnatal toxicity and fertility. The American public has not been
properly informed of these dramatic departures from the standard testing process, and the risks they generate.
Plaintiff America’s Frontline Doctors’ (“AFLDS”) medico-legal researchers have analyzed the accumulated COVID-19 Vaccine risk data, and report as follows:
Migration of the SARS-CoV-2 “Spike Protein” in the Body
* The SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. The spike protein is what allows the virus to infect other bodies. It is clear that the spike protein is not a simple, passive structure.
The spike protein is a “pathogenic protein” and a toxin that causes damage. The spike protein is itself biologically active, even without the virus. It is “fusogenic” and consequently binds more tightly to our cells, causing harm. If the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, it causes profound damage to their cardiovascular system, and crosses the blood-brain barrier to cause neurological damage. If the Vaccines were like traditional bona fide
vaccines, and did not leave the immediate site of vaccination, typically the shoulder muscle, beyond the local draining lymph node, then the damage that the spike protein could cause might
be limited.
However, the Vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what
effect they have. A group of international scientists has recently obtained the “biodistribution study” for the mRNA Vaccines from Japanese regulators. The study reveals that unlike traditional vaccines, this spike protein enters the bloodstream and circulates throughout the body over several days post-vaccination. It accumulates in a number of tissues, such as the spleen,
bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and ovaries. It fuses with receptors on our blood platelets, and also with cells lining our blood vessels. It can cause platelets to clump leading to clotting,
bleeding and heart inflammation. It can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause brain damage. It can be transferred to infants through breast milk. The VAERS system includes reports of infants suckling from vaccinated mothers experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract.
Vaccine Deaths
* The database indicates that the total reported vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represents a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year. In ten years (2009-2019) there
were 1529 vaccine deaths, whereas in the first quarter of 2021 there have been over 4,000.
Further, 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 are caused by the COVID-19 Vaccines, only 1% being caused by the numerous other vaccines reported in the system. It is estimated that VAERS only captures 1% to at best 10% of all vaccine adverse events.
IV. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
(i) for the under-18 age category;
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 65 of 67-66-3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.
Dated: July 19, 2021.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this date, July 19, 2021, I electronically transmitted this pleading to the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system for filing, which will send notification of
such filing to the following counsel for the Defendants:
Hon. Don B. Long, III
Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office
Northern District of Alabama
1801 Fourth Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Hon. James W. Harlow
Trial Attorney, Consumer Protection Branch
Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 386
Washington, D.C. 20044-0386
Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 67

https://img1.wsimg.com/.../M%20for%20PI%20file%20stamped.pdf

Related Articles:
Crucial excerpts from the Frontline Doctors' 67 page Covid watershed court document to STOP the mass experimentation on humans, and their expert reasons therefore, backed by hundreds of thousands of doctors globally.
Maybe every single person should first STUDY this document before they blindly yield to the biggest global media-driven propaganda campaign and falsehoods in history. (Due to the lengthy document, some of the information has been published as photo captions under the photos for easier reading):
* COVID recovered patients are at extremely high risk to a vaccine. They retain an antigenic fingerprint of natural infection in their tissues. They have all the requisite components of immune memory. Vaccination may activate a hyperimmune response leading to a significant tissue injury and possibly death.
* The true number of deaths caused by the Vaccines is at least 45,000. In the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign (in which 25% of the U.S. population at that time, 55 million Americans, were vaccinated), the Swine Flu vaccine was deemed dangerous and unsafe, and removed from the market, even though the vaccine resulted in only 53 deaths.
* Asymptomatic transmission:
On September 9, 2020, Dr. Fauci was forced to admit in an official press conference:
[E]ven if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person, even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.7
* NO emergency:
The emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal, since in fact there is no underlying emergency. Assuming the accuracy of Defendants’ COVID-19 death data, SARSCoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately inflated.
On March 24, 2020, DHHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations — exclusively for COVID-19. The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death
certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
In fact, DHHS statistics show that 95% of deaths classed as “COVID-19 deaths” involve an average of four additional co-morbidities. The CDC knew “…the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”
Similarly, the actual number of COVID-19 “cases” is far lower than the reported number.
DHHS authorized the emergency use of the polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19, with disastrous consequences. The PCR tests are themselves
experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. PCR test manufacturers use disclaimers like this in their product manuals: “[t]he FDA has not determined that the test is
safe or effective for the detection of SARS-Co-V-2.”
* No vaccine benefits
There are several factors that reduce any purported benefit of the COVID-19 Vaccines.
First, it is important to note that the Vaccines were only shown to reduce symptoms – not block transmission. For over a year now, these Defendants and state-level public health authorities have told the American public that SARS-CoV-2 can be spread by people who have none of the symptoms of COVID-19, therefore Americans must mask themselves, and submit to innumerable lockdowns and restrictions, even though they are not manifestly sick.
If that is the case, and these officials were not lying to the public, and asymptomatic spread is real, then what is the benefit of a vaccine that merely reduces symptoms? There isn’t any.
* Vaccine Rush
This 10-15 year testing process has been abandoned for purposes of the Vaccines. The first human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not confirmed until January 20, 2020, and less than a year later both mRNA Vaccines had EUAs and for the first time in history this novel mRNA technology was being injected into millions of human beings. As of June 7, 2021, 138 million Americans, representing 42% of the population, have been fully
vaccinated.
All of the stages of testing have been compressed in time, abbreviated in substance, and are overlapping, which dramatically increases the risks of the Vaccines. Plaintiffs’ investigation
indicates that Moderna and Pfizer designed their Vaccines in only two days. It appears that pharmaceutical companies did not independently verify the genome sequence that China released
on January 11, 2020. It appears that the Vaccines were studied for only 56 days in macaques, and 28 days in mice, and then animal studies were halted. It appears that the pharmaceutical
companies discarded their control groups receiving placebos, squandering the opportunity to learn about the rate of long-term complications, how long protection against the disease lasts and
how well the Vaccines inhibit transmission. A number of studies were deemed unnecessary and not performed prior to administration in human subjects, including single dose toxicity,
toxicokinetic, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, prenatal and postnatal development, offspring, local tolerance, teratogenic and postnatal toxicity and fertility. The American public has not been
properly informed of these dramatic departures from the standard testing process, and the risks they generate.
Plaintiff America’s Frontline Doctors’ (“AFLDS”) medico-legal researchers have analyzed the accumulated COVID-19 Vaccine risk data, and report as follows:
Migration of the SARS-CoV-2 “Spike Protein” in the Body
* The SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. The spike protein is what allows the virus to infect other bodies. It is clear that the spike protein is not a simple, passive structure.
The spike protein is a “pathogenic protein” and a toxin that causes damage. The spike protein is itself biologically active, even without the virus. It is “fusogenic” and consequently binds more tightly to our cells, causing harm. If the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, it causes profound damage to their cardiovascular system, and crosses the blood-brain barrier to cause neurological damage. If the Vaccines were like traditional bona fide
vaccines, and did not leave the immediate site of vaccination, typically the shoulder muscle, beyond the local draining lymph node, then the damage that the spike protein could cause might
be limited.
However, the Vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active and what
effect they have. A group of international scientists has recently obtained the “biodistribution study” for the mRNA Vaccines from Japanese regulators. The study reveals that unlike traditional vaccines, this spike protein enters the bloodstream and circulates throughout the body over several days post-vaccination. It accumulates in a number of tissues, such as the spleen,
bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and ovaries. It fuses with receptors on our blood platelets, and also with cells lining our blood vessels. It can cause platelets to clump leading to clotting,
bleeding and heart inflammation. It can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause brain damage. It can be transferred to infants through breast milk. The VAERS system includes reports of infants suckling from vaccinated mothers experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract.
Vaccine Deaths
* The database indicates that the total reported vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represents a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year. In ten years (2009-2019) there
were 1529 vaccine deaths, whereas in the first quarter of 2021 there have been over 4,000.
Further, 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 are caused by the COVID-19 Vaccines, only 1% being caused by the numerous other vaccines reported in the system. It is estimated that VAERS only captures 1% to at best 10% of all vaccine adverse events.
IV. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
(i) for the under-18 age category;
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 65 of 67-66-3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.
Dated: July 19, 2021.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this date, July 19, 2021, I electronically transmitted this pleading to the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system for filing, which will send notification of
such filing to the following counsel for the Defendants:
Hon. Don B. Long, III
Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office
Northern District of Alabama
1801 Fourth Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Hon. James W. Harlow
Trial Attorney, Consumer Protection Branch
Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 386
Washington, D.C. 20044-0386

https://img1.wsimg.com/.../M%20for%20PI%20file%20stamped.pdf

Related Articles:

Almost a year after the first Covid-19 case was reported in Wuhan City, China and caused an unprecedented global panic, a group of scientists made the first crucial breakthrough by determining that the virus is not spread by a-symptomatic transmission. 

This groundbreaking finding of the study, performed by 19 scientists from China, the UK and Australia in which almost 10 million people participated, change the entire protocol regarding preventative measures to curb the spreading of the virus - including mask-wearing, lockdowns and social distancing.   

The first human cases of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19, subsequently named SARS-CoV-2 were first reported by officials in Wuhan City, China, in December 2019.

WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) –

A study of almost 10 million people in Wuhan, China, found that asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, thus undermining the need for lockdowns, which are built on the premise of the virus being unwittingly spread by infectious, asymptomatic people.

Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communicationsthe paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also from scientific institutions across China as well as in the U.K. and Australia. It focused on the residents of Wuhan, ground zero for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people took part in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.

Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying justification of lockdowns enforced all across the world. The most recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still states that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC claimed that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.”

U.K. Health Secretary Matt Hancock also promoted this message, explaining that the concept of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 led to the U.K. advocating masks and referring to the “problem of asymptomatic transmission.”

However, the new study in Nature Communications, titled “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China,” debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission. 

It stated that out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Contact tracing was then carried out and of those 300, no cases of COVID-19 were detected in any of them. “A total of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.”

Both the asymptomatic patients and their contacts were placed in isolation for two weeks, and after the fortnight, the results remained the same. “None of detected positive cases or their close contacts became symptomatic or newly confirmed with COVID-19 during the isolation period.”

Further evidence showed that “virus cultures” in the positive and repositive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus' in positive cases detected in this study.”

Ages of those found to be asymptomatic ranged between 10 and 89, with the asymptomatic positive rate being “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and highest rate found among people older than 60.

The study also made the realization that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.”

These results are not without precedent. In June, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, shed doubt upon asymptomatic transmission. Speaking at a press conference, Van Kerkhove explained, “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

She then repeated the words “It’s very rare,” but despite her word choice of “rare,” Van Kerkhove could not point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.”

Her comments went against the predominant narrative justifying lockdowns, and at the time the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) highlighted that “she undermined the last bit of rationale there could be for lockdowns, mandated masks, social distancing regulation, and the entire apparatus of compulsion and coercion under which we’ve lived for three months.”

Swift to act, the WHO performed a U-turn, and the next day Van Kerkhove then declared that asymptomatic transmission was a “really complex question … We don’t actually have that answer yet.”

“I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies,” she added.

However, the new Wuhan study seems to present solid, scientific evidence that asymptomatic transmission is not just rare but nonexistent. Given that it found “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the study raises important questions about lockdowns. 

Commenting on the study, The Conservative Tree House noted that “all of the current lockdown regulations, mask wearing requirements and social distancing rules/decrees are based on a complete fallacy of false assumptions.” The evidence presented in the study shows that “‘very rare’ actually means ‘never’ asymptomatic spread just doesn’t happen – EVER.”

Such a large scientific study of 10 million people should not be overlooked, Jeffrey Tucker argued in the AIER, as it should be “huge news,” paving the way “to open up everything immediately.” Yet media reports have been virtually nonexistent and “ignored,” a fact that Tucker explained: “The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage.”

The recent findings should enable society to reopen once more, according to the AIER. Without asymptomatic transmission, “the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns,” life should resume and “we could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others.”

 “We keep hearing about how we should follow the science,” Tucker added. “The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening.” 

He closed his commentary with the question: “With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: Who is making decisions and why?"

 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds

No Covid-19 cases

https://web.facebook.com/elsa.wessels/posts/10157998044768397

 https://web.facebook.com/elsa.wessels/posts/10158665016323397

Amazing how quickly the COVID-19 phenomenon paralyzed and bankrupted the economy for most small and medium-sized businesses and forced everybody indoors to work "online" from home . . . while the stock markets clearly show which two industries are enjoying the biggest boom in history since Wuhan cried COVID!

The telecommunication and pharmaceutical tycoons will not allow ANYTHING to kill or curb this magic money-spinning bug that kick-started the global implementation of the new PR buzz words - "New Normal, Internet of Things, New World Order, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Pandemic, Social Distancing, Covi-pass, Vaccination."

Covid is here to stay and so-called "new waves" and outbreaks will continuously justify more lockdowns, economic crashes and political unrest until at least 50% of the world population has been bankrupted and vaccinated and so demoralized that they will welcome the New World Order and Economic Reset . . .

Big Pharma unscathed by Covid-19 crisis as market caps soar in Q2 2020 

https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/comment/big-pharma-covid-19-impact/?

Big Tech’s Investments Surge Amid The Pandemic. Here’s Where They’re Placing Bets

https://www.cbinsights.com/research/famga-investment-covid-19/?

https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/…/big-pharma-cov…/

https://www.cbinsights.com/resea…/famga-investment-covid-19/

THIS is MY generation's legacy to our children and future generations?

People who STILL believe one or other instant vaccine hastily manufactured by "caring philanthropists" will "end the pandemic" so that life will return to "normal", have some serious thinking and research to do.

BIG bucks in vaccines

https://www.forbes.com/…/moderna-ceo-stphane-bancel-becom…/…

Pharmaceutical companies pay up to $10 billion in "penalties" for illegal activities ranging from price fixing to suppressing lethal side effects and fraudulent representation of research data . . . and they are legally protected against all claims regarding vaccine injuries or fatalities.

The efficiency and safety of these instant Covid vaccines that are now tested on humans are so sketchy, questionable and prematurely promoted that it is an insult to science (and humanity) to even consider mandatory vaccinations. Scientists admit they do not even know whether a vaccine is the right route to pursue against Covid and whether it will have any long-term benefit - never mind the potential harmful side-effects it can have?

In Denmark, thousands of people took to the streets in mass protest gatherings to successfully stop new legislation for mandatory vaccination.

A law in Denmark that would have given authorities the power to forcibly inject people with a coronavirus vaccine has been abandoned after nine days of public protests.

The ‘epidemic law’ would have handed the Danish government the power to enact mandatory quarantine measures against anyone infected with a dangerous disease, but it was the part about vaccinations that caused the biggest uproar.

https://summit.news/…/forced-vaccination-law-in-denmark-aba…

The Council of the District of Columbia City on Tuesday passed the dangerous and predatory bill B23-0171 which permits children 11 years old and older to consent to vaccines on their own without parental knowledge or consent.

The bill also requires insurance companies, vaccine providers and schools to conceal the fact that the child has been vaccinated from the parent. And it sets up these young children to be targets of bullying and coercion to be vaccinated behind their parents backs.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/…/tell-dc-mayor-veto-pr…/?

As pharmaceutical firms gear up for mass vaccinations and treatments for COVID-19, based on this research, is there anything we should be looking out for?

Absolutely. Firms with high historical incidences of illegal activity are more likely to engage in the fraudulent representation of research data, the suppression of negative side-effects, and the false marketing of their products. It is very much related to COVID-19 research in that a firm with a history of misconduct would have a higher probability of lying about the efficacy of their vaccines or therapeutic treatments.

Are penalties just part of doing business?
It is only part of doing business if one believes that illegal activity is a legitimate business strategy. Otherwise, it is an indication of poor governance and leadership. Further, research I have done with Belk College colleagues Ted Amato (Economics) and Dean Jennifer Troyer (Economics) provides evidence that links illegal activity with reduced drug innovation. In other words, cheating is a substitute for innovation.

The billions of dollars in penalties – nearly $10 billion in the case of GlaxoSmithKlein – could instead have been spent on research and development.

What can government regulators learn from your research?
Aggressive oversight and enforcement are vital to ensure that pharmaceuticals are safely utilized and that pricing is consistent with federal regulations. In particular, to deter such behavior, it will be important to act on 2015 guidance from the Department of Justice, which requires that executives, and not just shareholders, be held liable for corporate misconduct. In addition, providing consistent and strong incentives for whistle-blowers is essential. Finally, there is ample room for additional regulation to better protect Americans from false or misleading information regarding drug efficacy and overpricing.

Since prescription drugs are critical to the health of citizens, should big pharmaceuticals be held to a higher standard?
All large pharmaceutical companies pledge to improve human welfare. Yet, the majority use marketing and pricing strategies that harm patient welfare to improve their bottom lines. Because of this hypocrisy, the pharmaceutical industry consistently ranks at the bottom among Gallup’s U.S. industry reputation rankings.

https://inside.uncc.edu/…/research-shows-price-pharmaceutic…

Unfortunately, the trials' results were announced via press releases, leaving many scientific uncertainties that will dictate how the vaccines will affect the course of the pandemic. Little safety data are available. How well the vaccines work in older people or those with underlying conditions and their efficacy in preventing severe disease are still unclear. Peer-reviewed publication should resolve these issues, but other questions will not be answerable for some time. For one, the duration of protection is unknown and will have a huge bearing on the practicalities and logistics of immunisation (will boosters be needed? How often?).

https://www.thelancet.com/…/PIIS0140-6736(20)32472…/fulltext

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/…/how-to-resist-governm…/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/…/listening-key-underst…/

Covid vaccine makes Moderma CEO overnight a billionaire

https://www.forbes.com/…/moderna-ceo-stphane-bancel-becom…/…

Related Articles: