THEY ARE GROWING THE COVID-19 VIRUS IN SOUTH AFRICA
"Listen to the clip below. From the 38th minute, a W.H.O. Doctor says more than twice that South Africa is "growing the Covid virus" and is testing if it can mutate. She then goes on to say that they as W.H.O are watching what South Africa is busy doing "with interest".
Why has Cyril never disclosed this to South Africans? Why was our government playing with such fire? South Africa can't run one power station successfully, but it plays with our lives by agreeing to "grow the virus and test if it can mutate" on our South African soil?
That is why Cyril was crying, the burden of what he and his government has exposed us to is unforgivable."
- Vytjie Mentor
4 years ago I warned that President Cyril Ramaphosa would be the most dangerous president South Africa has ever had. People laughed. In 2018 President Ramaphosa said he would forge a New World Order. People then voted for him and his satanic globalist agenda. Now that Ramaphosa is doing exactly what he said, people are complaining. The evil, deaths and devastation we have experienced in our country is only the beginning. What is happening is part of the NWO depopulation agenda - it's not about saving lives, it's about controlling and destroying lives.
Covid-19 was used as a political tool by the elite, satanists, liberals, communists, globalist leaders and corrupt politicians to usher in the New World Order. The blood of many people will be on their hands.
May the Lord help us. Our hope and trust is in God, not in a wicked government.
Next lockdown in SA predicted to start on 2 December 2021 - to kill the economy effectively?
Dr. Susan Vosloo, one of South Africa's most renowned Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons and a good friend of the late prof. Chris Barnard, has been speaking up against the draconic Covid lockdown and treatment protocols since March 2020, but she and thousands of SA like-minded medical experts have been ignored, ridiculed and discredited by the same SA mainstream media that used to quote them regularly as experts on health issues.
Read her Covid diary that was published on 5 August 2020:
"As this is written, still unable to travel, Malta's sunshine is sorely missed. It's mid-winter in the Southern hemisphere. Facing consequences of strategies applied to the novel Covid-19 pandemic, we drift on a tragic trajectory worldwide, particularly in Africa.
"One wonders: Are the 'blind' leading the sheeple? The only thing worse than being blind, is having sight, but no vision?"
Dr. Susan Vosloo with anesthetist husband Anton and their twin daughters (Photo: Marie Benoit)
YET, literally TENS of THOUSANDS of experienced and renowned top medical experts in SA and across the world are confirming Dr. Vosloo's views and have been trying non-stop to get their serious messages and warnings to the public despite the worst media censorship in history.
Since early last year, several SA doctors have been cautioning against the severe lockdown regulations and how it defies the purpose of ending the pandemic and saving lives.
The first to speak up publicly was prof. Patrick Bouic, although the so-called "mainstream media" has refused till now to voice any of the concerns of doctors who do not agree with the World Health Organisation's narrative.
Politicians, dr. Susan Vosloo, dr. Anton Ferreira and prof. Alex Van den Heever also added their voices against the disastrous effects of the lockdown regulations
Also, listen to dr. Beate Setzer's powerful message regarding media control, inflated stats, and fear-mongering media propaganda since January 2020.
Click on the link to listen to Drs. Fahie Hassan, Tros Bekker and Beate Setzer
Dr. Tros Bekker, a general practitioner in Pretoria, has written two books on the Covid P(l)andemic, both translated into English, and won't be silenced. He has been threatened, his videos removed, and viciously insulted on social media platforms, but he has been standing his ground to speak UP against what he believes is the biggest medical scandal and cover-up in history.
One of the most sobering and chilling summaries of what is truly happening in the world right now by Celeste Solum and Dr. Paul Cottrell . . .
Crucial excerpts from the Frontline Doctors' 67-page Covid watershed court document to STOP the mass experimentation on humans, and their expert reasons therefore, backed by hundreds of thousands of doctors globally.
Maybe every single person should first STUDY this document before they blindly yield to the biggest global media-driven propaganda campaign and falsehoods in history. (Due to the lengthy document, some of the information has been published as photo captions under the photos for easier reading):
* COVID recovered patients are at extremely high risk to a vaccine. They retain an antigenic fingerprint of natural infection in their tissues. They have all the requisite components of immune memory. Vaccination may activate a hyperimmune response leading to a significant tissue injury and possibly death.
* The true number of deaths caused by the Vaccines is at least 45,000. In the 1976 Swine Flu vaccine campaign (in which 25% of the U.S. population at that time, 55 million Americans, were vaccinated), the Swine Flu vaccine was deemed dangerous and unsafe, and removed from the market, even though the vaccine resulted in only 53 deaths.
* Asymptomatic transmission:
On September 9, 2020, Dr. Fauci was forced to admit in an official press conference:
[E]ven if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person, even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.7
* NO emergency:
The emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal, since in fact there is no underlying emergency. Assuming the accuracy of Defendants’ COVID-19 death data, SARSCoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately inflated.
On March 24, 2020, DHHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations — exclusively for COVID-19.
The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
In fact, DHHS statistics show that 95% of deaths classed as “COVID-19 deaths” involve an average of four additional co-morbidities. The CDC knew “…the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”
Similarly, the actual number of COVID-19 “cases” is far lower than the reported number.
DHHS authorized the emergency use of the polymerase chain reaction (“PCR”) test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19, with disastrous consequences. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, authorized by the FDA under separate EUAs. PCR test manufacturers use disclaimers like this in their product manuals: “[t]he FDA has not determined that the test is safe or effective for the detection of SARS-Co-V-2.”
* No vaccine benefits
There are several factors that reduce any purported benefit of the COVID-19 Vaccines.
First, it is important to note that the Vaccines were only shown to reduce symptoms – not block transmission. For over a year now, these Defendants and state-level public health authorities have told the American public that SARS-CoV-2 can be spread by people who have none of the symptoms of COVID-19, therefore Americans must mask themselves, and submit to innumerable lockdowns and restrictions, even though they are not manifestly sick.
If that is the case, and these officials were not lying to the public, and asymptomatic spread is real, then what is the benefit of a vaccine that merely reduces symptoms? There isn’t any.
* Vaccine Rush
This 10-15 year testing process has been abandoned for purposes of the Vaccines. The first human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not confirmed until January 20, 2020, and less than a year later both mRNA Vaccines had EUAs and for the first time in history, this novel mRNA technology was being injected into millions of human beings. As of June 7, 2021, 138 million Americans, representing 42% of the population, have been fully vaccinated.
All of the stages of testing have been compressed in time, abbreviated in substance, and are overlapping, which dramatically increases the risks of the Vaccines. Plaintiffs’ investigation indicates that Moderna and Pfizer designed their Vaccines in only two days.
It appears that pharmaceutical companies did not independently verify the genome sequence that China released
on January 11, 2020. It appears that the Vaccines were studied for only 56 days in macaques, and 28 days in mice, and then animal studies were halted. It appears that the pharmaceutical companies discarded their control groups receiving placebos, squandering the opportunity to learn about the rate of long-term complications, how long protection against the disease lasts, and how well the Vaccines inhibit transmission.
A number of studies were deemed unnecessary and not performed prior to administration in human subjects, including single-dose toxicity, toxicokinetic, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, prenatal and postnatal development, offspring, local tolerance, teratogenic and postnatal toxicity, and fertility. The American public has not been
properly informed of these dramatic departures from the standard testing process, and the risks they generate.
Plaintiff America’s Frontline Doctors’ (“AFLDS”) medico-legal researchers have analyzed the accumulated COVID-19 Vaccine risk data, and report as follows:
* Migration of the SARS-CoV-2 “Spike Protein” in the Body
* The SARS-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. The spike protein is what allows the virus to infect other bodies. It is clear that the spike protein is not a simple, passive structure.
The spike protein is a “pathogenic protein” and a toxin that causes damage. The spike protein is itself biologically active, even without the virus. It is “fusogenic” and consequently binds more tightly to our cells, causing harm. If the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, it causes profound damage to their cardiovascular system and crosses the blood-brain barrier to cause neurological damage.
If the Vaccines were like traditional bona fide vaccines and did not leave the immediate site of vaccination, typically the shoulder muscle, beyond the local draining lymph node, then the damage that the spike protein could cause might be limited.
However, the Vaccines were authorized without any studies demonstrating where the spike proteins traveled in the body following vaccination, how long they remain active, and what effect they have.
A group of international scientists has recently obtained the “biodistribution study” for the mRNA Vaccines from Japanese regulators. The study reveals that, unlike traditional vaccines, this spike protein enters the bloodstream and circulates throughout the body over several days post-vaccination. It accumulates in a number of tissues, such as the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and ovaries. It fuses with receptors on our blood platelets, and also with cells lining our blood vessels. It can cause platelets to clump leading to clotting, bleeding, and heart inflammation.
It can also cross the blood-brain barrier and cause brain damage. It can be transferred to infants through breast milk. The VAERS system includes reports of infants suckling from vaccinated mothers experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract.
* Vaccine Deaths
* The database indicates that the total reported vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represent a 12,000% to 25,000% increase in vaccine deaths, year-on-year.
In ten years (2009-2019) there were 1529 vaccine deaths, whereas in the first quarter of 2021 there have been over 4,000.
Further, 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 are caused by the COVID-19 Vaccines, only 1% being caused by the numerous other vaccines reported in the system. It is estimated that VAERS only captures 1% to at best 10% of all vaccine adverse events.
Accordingly, and for all of the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs move under Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction against Defendants enjoining them from continuing to authorize the emergency use of the so-called “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine,” “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 Vaccine” pursuant to their respective EUAs, and from granting full FDA approval of the Vaccines:
(i) for the under-18 age category;
(ii) for those, regardless of age, who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination; and
(iii) until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite “conditions of authorization” under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 65 of 67-66-3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.
Dated: July 19, 2021.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this date, July 19, 2021, I electronically transmitted this pleading to the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system for filing, which will send notification of such filing to the following counsel for the Defendants:
Hon. Don B. Long, III
Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office
Northern District of Alabama
1801 Fourth Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Hon. James W. Harlow
Trial Attorney, Consumer Protection Branch
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 386
Washington, D.C. 20044-0386
Case 2:21-cv-00702-CLM Document 15 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 67.
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (“ADE”) occurs when SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, created by a Vaccine, instead of protecting the vaccinated person, cause a more severe or lethal case of the COVID-19 disease when the person is later exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild.9
The vaccine amplifies the infection rather than preventing damage. It may only be seen after months or years of use in populations around the world. This paradoxical reaction has been seen in other vaccines and animal trials. One well-documented example is with the Dengue fever vaccine, which resulted in avoidable deaths. Dengue fever has caused 100-400 million infections, 500,000 hospitalizations, and a 2.5% fatality rate annually worldwide. It is a leading cause of death in children in Asian and Latin American countries. Despite over 50 years of active research, a Dengue vaccine still has not gained widespread approval in large part due to the phenomenon of ADE. Vaccine manufacturer Sanofi Pharmaceutical spent 20 years and nearly $2 billion to develop the Dengue vaccine and published their results in the New England Journal of Medicine, which was quickly endorsed by the World Health Organization.
Vigilant scientists clearly warned about the danger from ADE, which the Philippines ignored when it administered the vaccine to hundreds of thousands of children in 2016. Later, when these children were exposed in the wild, many became severely ill and 600 children died.
The former head of the Dengue department of the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM) was indicted in 2019 by the Philippines Department of Justice for “reckless imprudence resulting [in] homicide,” because he “facilitated, with undue haste,” Dengvaxia’s approval and its rollout among Philippine schoolchildren.10
ADE has been observed in the coronavirus setting. The original SARS-CoV-1 caused an epidemic in 2003. This virus is a coronavirus that is reported to be 78% similar to the current SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes the disease COVID-19.
Scientists attempted to create a vaccine.
Of approximately 35 vaccine candidates, the best four were trialed in ferrets. The vaccines appeared to work in the ferrets. However, when those vaccinated ferrets were challenged by SARS-CoV-1 in the wild, they became very ill and died due to what we would term a sudden severe cytokine storm. The reputed journals Science, Nature, and Journal of Infectious Diseases have all documented ADE risks in relation to the development of experimental COVID-19 vaccines.
The application filed by Dr. Yeadon with the European Medicines Agency on December 1, 2020, also mentioned the risk from ADE. ADE is discovered during long-term animal studies, to which the Vaccines have not been subjected.
Effect on the Young
The Vaccines are more deadly or harmful to the young than the virus, and that is excluding the unknown future effects on fertility, clotting, and autoimmune disease.
Those under the age of 18 face statistically zero chance of death from SARS-CoV-2 according to data published by the CDC, but there are reports of heart inflammation — both myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) — in young men, and at least one documented fatal heart attack of a healthy 15-year old boy in Colorado two days after receiving the Pfizer Vaccine.8
The CDC has admitted that “[s]ince April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), particularly in adolescents and young adults.
More Virulent Strains
Scientists are concerned that universal inoculation may create more virulent strains. This has been observed with Marek’s Disease in chickens.11 A large number of chickens not at risk of death were vaccinated, and now all chickens must be vaccinated or they will die from a virus that was nonlethal prior to widespread vaccination. The current policy to pursue universal vaccination regardless of risk may exert the same evolutionary pressure toward more highly virulent strains.
Presently, the vaccinated are permitted to donate their spike protein-laden blood into the blood supply, which projects all of the risks discussed supra onto the general population of unvaccinated blood donees. Scientists and healthcare professionals all over the world are sounding the alarm and frantically appealing to the FDA to halt the Vaccines. They have made innumerable public statements.
Fifty-seven top scientists and doctors from Central and South America are calling for an immediate end to all Vaccine COVID-19 programs. Other physician-scientist groups have made similar calls, among them: Canadian Physicians, Israeli People’s Committee, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, World Doctors Alliance, Doctors 4 Covid Ethics, and Plaintiff America’s Frontline Doctors.
These are healthcare professionals in the field who are seeing the catastrophic and deadly results of the rushed Vaccines, and reputed professors of science and medicine, including the physician with the greatest number of COVID-19 scientific citations worldwide. They accuse the government of deviating from long-standing policy to protect the public. In the past, government has halted vaccine trials based on a tiny fraction — far less than 1% — of the number of unexplained deaths already recorded.
The scientists all agree that the spike protein (produced by the Vaccines) causes disease even without the virus, which has motivated them to lend their imprimatur to, and risk their reputation and standing on, these public objections.
There are numerous alternative safe and effective treatments for COVID-19.
These alternatives are supported by over 300 studies, including randomized controlled studies. Tens of thousands of physicians have publicly attested, and many have testified under oath, as to the safety and efficacy of the alternatives.
Globally and in the United States, treatments such as Ivermectin, Budesonide, Dexamethasone, convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibodies, Vitamin D, Zinc, Azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine, Colchicine and Remdesivir are being used to great effect, and they are far safer than the COVID-19 Vaccines.12
Doctors from the Smith Center for Infectious Diseases and Urban Health and the Saint Barnabas Medical Center have published an Observational Study on 255 Mechanically Ventilated COVID Patients at the Beginning of the USA Pandemic, which states: “Causal modeling establishes that weight-adjusted HCQ [Hydroxychloroquine] and AZM [Azithromycin] therapy improves survival by over 100%.”13 12 Numerous studies can be reviewed here: https://c19early.com (last visited June 7, 2021).
Observational studies in Delhi and Mexico City show dramatic reductions in COVID-19 case and death counts following the mass distribution of Ivermectin. These results align with those of a study in Argentina, in which 800 healthcare professionals received Ivermectin, while another 400 did not. Of the 800, not a single person contracted COVID-19, while more than half of the control group did contract it.
Dr. Pierre Kory, a lung specialist who has treated more COVID-19 patients than most doctors, representing a group of some of the most highly published physicians in the world, with over 2,000 peer-reviewed publications among them, testified before the U.S. Senate in December 2020.14 He testified that based on 9 months of review of scientific data from 30 studies, Ivermectin obliterates transmission of the SARS-CoV2 virus and is a powerful prophylactic (if you take it, you will not contract COVID-19). Four large randomized controlled trials totaling over 1500 patients demonstrate that Ivermectin is safe and effective as a prophylaxis.
In early outpatient treatment, three randomized controlled trials and multiple observational studies show that Ivermectin reduces the need for hospitalization and death in statistically significant numbers. In inpatient treatment, four randomized controlled trials show that Ivermectin prevents death in a statistically significant, large magnitude. Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for its impacts on global health.
Inexplicably, the Defendants never formed or assigned a task force to research and review existing alternatives for preventing and treating COVID-19. Instead, the Defendants and others set about censoring both concerns about the Vaccines, and information about safe and effective alternatives.
The Vaccines are Not Approved by the FDA, but Merely Authorized for Emergency Use
Defendants have failed to educate the American public that the FDA has not actually “approved” the Vaccines, and that the DHHS Secretary has not in fact determined that the Vaccines are “safe and effective,” and on the contrary has merely determined, in accordance with the proverbial “weasel language” of the EUA statute, that “it is reasonable to believe” that the Vaccines “may be” effective and that the benefits outweigh the risks. Instead of being so educated, the public is barraged with unqualified “safe and effective” messaging from all levels of federal and state government, the private sector and the media. They hear from no higher authority than the President himself that: “The bottom line is this: I promise you they are safe. They are safe. And even more importantly, they’re extremely effective. If you’re vaccinated, you are protected.”
The public is also unaware of the serious financial conflicts-of-interest that burden Dr. Fauci, the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, and the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee which advises and consults Defendants with respect to the Vaccine EUAs, as outlined in the Complaint (ECF 10, ¶¶ 250-256). Without the information regarding conflicts of interest, the public cannot assess for themselves the reliability and objectivity of the analysis underpinning the EUAs.
The Significant Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines
Perhaps the first step in understanding the potential risks of the Vaccines is to understand exactly what they are, and what they are not. The CDC defines a “vaccine” as: “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose. The CDC defines “immunity” as: “Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.” However, the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” do not meet the CDC’s own definitions. They do not stimulate the body to produce immunity from a disease. They are a synthetic fragment of nucleic acid embedded in a fat carrier that is introduced into human cells, not for the purpose of inducing immunity from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and not to block further transmission of the virus, but in order to lessen the symptoms of COVID-19.
No published, peer-reviewed studies prove that the “PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” confer immunity or stop transmission. Further, the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” are not “vaccines” within the common, lay understanding of the public. Since vaccines were first discovered in 1796 by Dr. Edward Jenner, who used cowpox to inoculate humans against smallpox, and called the process “vaccination” (from the Latin term vaca for cow), the public has had an entrenched understanding that a vaccine is a microorganism, either alive but weakened, or dead, that is introduced into the human body in order to trigger the production of antibodies that confer immunity from the targeted disease, and also prevent its transmission to others. The public is accustomed to these traditional vaccines and understands them.
* The public is fundamentally uninformed about the gene therapy technology behind the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.” Referring to the “mRNA technology” in its Vaccine, Moderna admits the “novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines” in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Further, it admits that the FDA classes its Vaccine as a form of “gene therapy.” No dead or attenuated virus is used in the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.” Rather, instructions, via a piece of lab-created genetic code (the mRNA) are injected into your body that tell your body how to make a certain “spike protein” that is purportedly useful in attacking the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
By referring to the “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” and the “Moderna COVID19 Vaccine” as “vaccines,” and by allowing others to do the same, the Defendants knowingly seduce and mislead the public, short-circuit independent, critical evaluation and decision-making by the consumers of these products, and vitiate their informed consent to this novel technology which is being deployed in the unsuspecting human population for the first time in history.
Meanwhile, the federal government is orchestrating a nationwide media campaign funded with $1 billion — not to ensure that the Defendants meet their statutory disclosure obligations, but solely to promote the purported benefits of the Vaccines.
Global Media Capture
Simultaneously, the Associated Press, Agence France Press, British Broadcasting Corporation, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu Times, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post and The New York Times all participate in the “Trusted News Initiative” which has agreed to not allow any news critical of the Vaccines.
Individual physicians are being censored on social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok), the modern day “public square.” Plaintiff AFLDS has recorded innumerable instances of social media deleting scientific content posted by AFLDS members that runs counter to the prevailing Vaccine narrative, and then banning them from the platform altogether as users. Facebook has blocked the streaming of entire events at which AFLDS Founder Dr. Simone Gold has been an invited guest, prior to her uttering a word. Other doctors have been banned for posting or tweeting screenshots of government database VAERS. The censorship also extends to medical journals. In an unprecedented move, the four founding topic editors for the Frontiers in Pharmacology journal all resigned together due to their collective inability to publish peer-reviewed scientific data on various drugs for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Philippe Douste-Blazy, a cardiology physician, former France Health Minister, 2017 candidate for Director of the WHO and former Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, described the censorship in chilling detail: The Lancet boss said, “Now we are not going to be able to, basically, if this continues, publish any more clinical research data, because the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today and are able to use such methodologies, as to have us accept papers which are apparently, methodologically perfect but in reality, which manage to conclude what they want to conclude.” … one of the greatest subjects never anyone could have believed … I have been doing research for 20 years in my life. I never thought the boss of The Lancet could say that. And the boss of the New England Journal of Medicine too. He even said it was “criminal” — the word was used by him. That is, if you will, when there is an outbreak like the COVID-19, in reality, there are people … us.